Penque v. Department of Public Safety

CourtDistrict Court, D. Hawaii
DecidedAugust 10, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-00338
StatusUnknown

This text of Penque v. Department of Public Safety (Penque v. Department of Public Safety) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Hawaii primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penque v. Department of Public Safety, (D. Haw. 2020).

Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

ANGELO DAVID PENQUE, ) CIV. NO. 20-00338 DKW-WRP #A6110619 ) ) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, ) PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ) vs. ) ) DEP’T OF PUBLIC SAFETY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. ECF No. 2. The Motion is not on a court form, lacks certification by prison officials regarding the amount currently in Plaintiff’s account, and lacks an account statement showing all deposits and withdrawals for the preceding six months. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED as incomplete. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to submit a complete in forma pauperis application on a form provided by the Clerk of Court that contains the information listed above on or before August 21, 2020. Failure to timely do so will result in automatic dismissal of this suit without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Olivares v. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995). The court will take no action on Plaintiff’s submissions until he has either paid the $400.00 civil filing fee or is granted in forma pauperis status. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff an Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By A Prisoner so that he can comply with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 10, 2020 at Honolulu, Hawaii.

TES DIST, 7 & 7 & ® 5", > a % /s/ Derrick K. Watson Derrick K. Watson i fm i United States District Judge

Angelo David Penque v. Dep’t of Public Safety, et al; Civil No. 20-00338 DKW- WRP; ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Penque v. Dep’t of Public Safety, et al., No. 1:20-cv-00338 DKW-WRP

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olivares v. Marshall
59 F.3d 109 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Penque v. Department of Public Safety, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penque-v-department-of-public-safety-hid-2020.