Penoyer v. State

494 So. 2d 236, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1860, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9461
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1986·No. No. 86-1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Allen Penoyer appeals from an order summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief. In Penoyer v. State, 485 So.2d 7 (Fla.2d DCA 1986), we remanded this case with directions either to grant Penoyer a hearing on his allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel, or to attach sufficient portions of the record to demonstrate that Penoyer was not entitled to relief.

After remand the trial court again denied the motion without a hearing, and attached to its order a large number of documents, principally transcripts from Penoyer’s trial. We agree with the trial court that these documents conclusively establish that the motion should be denied. In fact, the allegations contained in the motion are inconsistent with the position taken by Penoyer during his lengthy and detailed trial testimony. Accordingly, the order of the trial court denying the motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penoyer v. State, 494 So. 2d 236, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1860, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9461 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

494 So. 2d 236 (Penoyer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penoyer v. State
945 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Young v. State
569 So. 2d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)