Penny v. Wieland

California Supreme Court

Penny v. Wieland

1 Cal. Unrep. 767

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 29, 1872

DocketNo. 3300

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 767 (Penny v. Wieland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penny v. Wieland, 1 Cal. Unrep. 767 (Cal. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

— No errors of law are insisted upon in the printed points. The only claim upon which the appellant bases his right to recover the possession of the premises is founded upon his alleged prior possession. Upon looking into the record we observe that the evidence as to that possession was conflicting within the rule which protects the finding implied in support of the judgment against him from being disturbed here.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

— No errors of law are insisted upon in the printed points. The only claim upon which the appellant bases his right to recover the possession of the premises is founded upon his alleged prior possession. Upon looking into the record we observe that the evidence as to that possession was conflicting within the rule which protects the finding implied in support of the judgment against him from being disturbed here.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penny-v-wieland-cal-1872.