Penny v. United States

154 F.2d 629, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 1946
DocketNo. 5472
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 154 F.2d 629 (Penny v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penny v. United States, 154 F.2d 629, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093 (4th Cir. 1946).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hugh Marion Penny, on October 30, 1946, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, a motion to vacate a sentence imposed on him by that court in 1940, for a violation of the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 408.

The ground of the motion was that no federal offense had been committed until the stolen automobile had been driven from Virginia into West Virginia and therefore no crime was ever committed in the Eastern District of Virginia.

As was pointed out by the court below, in a memorandum opinion filed in connection with the denial of Penny’s motion, the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act expressly provides that a person violating the Act may be tried and punished in any district through which the motor vehicle was transported. Such a provision, which has prototypes in many other federal criminal statutes, is clearly valid. See Ventimiglia v. Aderhold, Warden, D. C., 51 F.2d 308. The motion to vacate the sentence is thus lacking in merit.

The judgment of the District Court is, accordingly, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Joseph Putnam v. United States
337 F.2d 313 (Tenth Circuit, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 F.2d 629, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penny-v-united-states-ca4-1946.