Penny v. State

370 S.W.3d 292, 2012 WL 1912809, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 732

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Penny appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree robbery. Penny contends the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to strike an allegedly unqualified juror for cause. For reasons explained in a memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).