Penny v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Penny v. State

126 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 666

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 18, 1930

Docket8 Div. 908.

StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 926 (Penny v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penny v. State, 126 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 666 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Illegal possession of prohibited liquor.

Appellant offered no testimony. He made no motion for a new trial. There are no questions apparent for our decision, other than the one of whether or not it was error to refuse to give, at appellant’s request, the general affirmative charge in his favor. After a careful reading of the testimony, we are not persuaded that there was no evidence of his guilt. In this situation the said general affirmative charge was properly refused.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

Illegal possession of prohibited liquor.

Appellant offered no testimony. He made no motion for a new trial. There are no questions apparent for our decision, other than the one of whether or not it was error to refuse to give, at appellant’s request, the general affirmative charge in his favor. After a careful reading of the testimony, we are not persuaded that there was no evidence of his guilt. In this situation the said general affirmative charge was properly refused.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penny-v-state-alactapp-1930.