Penny v. Penny

Missouri Court of Appeals

Penny v. Penny

823 S.W.2d 67, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1710, 1991 WL 238280

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 1991·No. No. 58821·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals after the trial court sustained husband’s motion to modify their dissolution decree reducing husband’s maintenance obligations to wife. We affirm.

There was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding of a substantial and continuing change of circumstances, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting [68]*68forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals after the trial court sustained husband’s motion to modify their dissolution decree reducing husband’s maintenance obligations to wife. We affirm.

There was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding of a substantial and continuing change of circumstances, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting [68]*68forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Penny v. Penny, 823 S.W.2d 67, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1710, 1991 WL 238280 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 67 (Penny v. Penny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.