Penny Creaton v. Otis Bowen, Patricia Van Berg v. A.N. Shinpoch

826 F.2d 6
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 26, 1987·No. 86-6148·Published

Opinion

826 F.2d 6

Penny CREATON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Otis BOWEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Patricia VAN BERG, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A.N. SHINPOCH, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 86-6148, 86-3870.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 7, 1987.
Decided Aug. 26, 1987.

Mark Greenberg, Los Angeles, Cal., and Robin Zukoski, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants.

George Wu, Los Angeles, Cal., and P.K. Abraham, Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge, Presiding.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT and HALL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We affirm for the reasons stated in Gorrie v. Bowen, 809 F.2d 508 (8th Cir.1987), and Oliver v. Ledbetter, 821 F.2d 1507 (11th Cir.1987). See also Bowen v. Gilliard, --- U.S. ----, ---- n. 5, 107 S.Ct. 3008, 3013 n. 5, 97 L.Ed.2d 485 (1987) (citing Gorrie with approval).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penny Creaton v. Otis Bowen, Patricia Van Berg v. A.N. Shinpoch, 826 F.2d 6 (9th Cir. 1987).

826 F.2d 6 (Penny Creaton v. Otis Bowen, Patricia Van Berg v. A.N. Shinpoch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowen v. Gilliard
483 U.S. 587 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Ruby Oliver v. James G. Ledbetter
821 F.2d 1507 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
Gorrie v. Bowen
809 F.2d 508 (Eighth Circuit, 1987)