Pennsylvania v. Oliphant
This text of 1 Add. 345 (Pennsylvania v. Oliphant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
INDICTMENT for a nuisance in obstructing a water-course, so as to overflow an high way.
The obstruction was a dam for a forge. It did not appear, that the road had ever been laid out by any authority.
objected to going into any evidence, until a copy of the order of the court of Quarter Sessions, confirming the road, should be produced.
gave up the prosecution, and assented to a verdict of acquittal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Add. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-v-oliphant-pactcomplfayett-1797.