Pennsylvania v. Gillespie
1 Add. 267
This text of 1 Add. 267 (Pennsylvania v. Gillespie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pennsylvania v. Gillespie, 1 Add. 267 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1795).
Opinion
For taking down an advertisement of a sale of property for private use, an action would, in my opinion, lie for contingent damages. It seems to follow, therefore, that, when the sale is under a public law, for public use, an indictment should lie for the injury done to the public.
He was convicted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Add. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-v-gillespie-pactcomplfayett-1795.