Pennsylvania Trust Co. v. Kline
43 A. 401, 192 Pa. 1, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 869
Opinion
For reasons given by the learned president of the common pleas, in his opinion sent np with the record, he was clearly right in entering judgment against the defendants for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. As to the alleged duress, the affidavit is manifestly defective in that it fails to specify any act or acts constituting duress. It is also defective in other respects, as shown by the court below. We find nothing in the case that requires discussion.
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pennsylvania Trust Co. v. Kline, 43 A. 401, 192 Pa. 1, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 869 (Pa. 1899).
43 A. 401 (Pennsylvania Trust Co. v. Kline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hastings Bank of Hastings v. Covitch
188 A. 129 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Moyer v. Dodson
61 A. 937 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)