Pennsylvania System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Pennsylvania Railroad

267 U.S. 219, 45 S. Ct. 312, 69 L. Ed. 581, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 777
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 2, 1925
DocketNo. 629
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 U.S. 219 (Pennsylvania System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pennsylvania System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 267 U.S. 219, 45 S. Ct. 312, 69 L. Ed. 581, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 777 (1925).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Tapt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case turns on substantially the same questions as those' just decided in Pennsylvania Federation No. 90 against the same defendant, ante, p. 203. It is a bill in equity by a trade union called The Pennsylvania System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of- Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees, made u.p of several classes of employees, clerical and otherwise, of the Pennsylvania Railroad, seeking to enjoin the Company from maintaining the same kind of alleged conspiracy as that described and complained of by Federation No. 90 in the previous case. There is no prayer in the'bill in this case for damages as there'was in the other, but the circumstances and the law sought to be applied to them ate in every respect similar. As in the previous case, elaborate briefs were filed to justify the contention that Title III of the Transportation Act vested the employees of the Pennsylvania Road with definite rights, the violation of-which constituted a [220]*220legal wrong and that on these a charge of conspiracy could be predicated, and a remedy by injunction might be had in behalf of the complainants. For the same reasons as those stated in the previous case, the same conclusion must be reached. The Circuit Court of Appeals and the District Court were therefore right in dismissing the bill. The decree is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penna. Brotherhood v. PRR Co.
267 U.S. 219 (Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 U.S. 219, 45 S. Ct. 312, 69 L. Ed. 581, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-system-board-of-adjustment-of-the-brotherhood-of-railway-scotus-1925.