Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.

227 F. 1021, 141 C.C.A. 671, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2410
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 F. 458
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided September 27, 1915·No. No. 317·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It was incorrectly stated in the opinion (225 Fed. 734, ——C. C. A. -) that the Metropolitan receivers had paid the special franchise tax for 1907 due in October of that year. This, however, in no way affects the decision, whose purpose was to define the manner in which the account should be stated between the receivers and the Second Avenue Railroad OoinI>any, viz.: That down to June i, 1908, the receivers should be charged for úse and occupation with an amount equal to the stipulated rent, and thereafter to November 13, 1908, only with the net earnings of the road. As the receivers have not paid the tax in question, they must be charged with it. The motion for a rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co., 227 F. 1021, 141 C.C.A. 671, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2410 (2d Cir. 1915).

227 F. 1021 (Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.
225 F. 734 (Second Circuit, 1915)