Pennsylvania State Police v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bushta)

168 A.3d 1260, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 850
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 18, 2017·No. No. 483 WAL 2016·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Is compensation payable pursuant to Article III of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, when the Claimant suffers a work related injury and is concurrently entitled to benefits under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act and the Heart and Lung Act?
(2) Did the Commonwealth Court err in its determination that a self-insured municipality [sic] is not entitled to subrogation, to the extent of the compensation payable pursuant to Article III of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation [Act], when it has concurrent obligations to an injured State Trooper under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act and the Heart and Lung Act?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania State Police v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bushta), 168 A.3d 1260, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 850 (Pa. 2017).

168 A.3d 1260 (Pennsylvania State Police v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bushta)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pa. State Police v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.
184 A.3d 958 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)
PSP, Aplt. v. WCAB (Bushta)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Com. of Pa. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.
182 A.3d 1082 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)