Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Jet-Set Restaurant, LLC

171 A.3d 1282
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 13, 2017·No. 327 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The isjsue, restated for clarity is:

Does the definition of “frequenting” set forth in Appeal of Speranza, 416 Pa. 348, 206 A.2d 292 (1965) still apply to Section 4-493(14) of the Liquor Code, or do the 2003 Amendments to the Code demonstrate the General Assembly’s intent that a minor may not be inside a licensed premises even a single time unless one of the exceptions enumerated in Section 4-493(14) applies?

Allowance of appeal is DENIED as to all remaining issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Jet-Set Restaurant, LLC, 171 A.3d 1282 (Pa. 2017).

171 A.3d 1282 (Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Jet-Set Restaurant, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pa. St. Police, Aplt. v. Jet-Set Restaurant, LLC
191 A.3d 817 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)