Pennsylvania School Boards Ass'n v. Public School Employees' Retirement System

659 A.2d 86, 1995 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 242
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 18, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 659 A.2d 86 (Pennsylvania School Boards Ass'n v. Public School Employees' Retirement System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pennsylvania School Boards Ass'n v. Public School Employees' Retirement System, 659 A.2d 86, 1995 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 242 (Pa. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

The Pennsylvania School Boards Association, Inc. (PSBA) appeals from an order of the Public School Employees’ Retirement Board (Board) granting Alvin Goldberg one year of service credit for the 1976-77 school year pursuant to section 8302 of the Public School Employees’ Retirement Code (Retirement Code)1 and 22 Pa.Code § 213.2(a)(1).2 We reverse.

Goldberg was a full-time salaried school employee of the Pennsbury School District (District) when, during the 1976-77 school year, he and other teachers engaged in a lawful strike for twenty-nine days. The collective bargaining agreement ending the strike provided, in part, that teachers were to work no more than 163 of the 184 school days originally scheduled for the 1976-77 school year. In addition, teachers were to be paid /Í84 of their salaries for each day worked, up to 163 days.

The District subsequently reported to the Pennsylvania School Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS) that its teachers worked 163 days during the 1976-77 school year. PSERS credited Goldberg with .91 years of service for the year3 and, as of June 30, 1989, Goldberg had 29.91 years of service credit in the retirement system.

Goldberg then filed a request with PSERS for a full year of retirement credit for the 1976-77 school year. Goldberg based his request on 22 Pa.Code § 213.2(a)(1), which gives a full-time salaried employee one year of service credit for 1,100 hours of employment, and on the fact that he worked a total [88]*88of 1,222.5 hours during the 1976-77 school year.4 PSBA filed a petition to intervene, which the Board granted, and a hearing was held before a hearing examiner.

The hearing examiner made findings of fact and concluded that Goldberg is entitled to a full year of retirement credit for the 1976-77 school year. PSBA and PSERS filed exceptions with the Board, which adopted the findings of the hearing examiner and concluded that Goldberg is entitled to a full year of retirement credit for the 1976-77 school year under 22 Pa.Code § 213.2(a)(1). PSBA appeals to this court.

On appeal,5 PSBA argues that the Board erred by granting Goldberg a full year of retirement credit under 22 Pa.Code § 213.2(a)(1) because the regulation is contrary to section 8302 of the Retirement Code, the enabling statute, and is therefore invalid. We agree.

Section 8302(a) of the Retirement Code states that a full-time salaried school employee, like Goldberg,6 “shall receive one year of credit for each school year or the corresponding fraction thereof, in accordance with the proportion of the full school year for which the required regular member contributions have been made.” 24 Pa.C.S. § 8302(a) (emphasis added). Here, Goldberg made the required regular member contributions for only 163 days of the full school year. Thus, Goldberg is entitled to service credit for the corresponding fraction of the full school year.7

The regulation, on the other hand, states that a full-time salaried employee, like Goldberg, “shall receive one year of credited service for each [school year during] ... which he contributes for at least ... 1100 hours of employment.” 22 Pa.Code § 213.2(a)(1). Here, Goldberg worked and made contributions for 1,222.5 hours during the 1976-77 school year. Under the regulation, Goldberg is thus entitled to one year of service credit. This result is clearly contrary to the one reached via the formula articulated in the enabling statute; therefore, we conclude that the regulation is invalid. Consulting Engineers Council of Pennsylvania v. State Architects Licensure Board, 522 Pa. 204, 560 A.2d 1375 (1989).

Accordingly, we reverse.8

ORDER

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 1995, the order of the Public School Employes’ Retirement Board, dated September 20, 1994, is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Consulting Engineers Council v. State Architects Licensure Board
560 A.2d 1375 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Christiana v. Public School Employes' Retirement Board
646 A.2d 645 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
659 A.2d 86, 1995 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-school-boards-assn-v-public-school-employees-retirement-pacommwct-1995.