Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 413
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 11, 1961·No. No. 36558·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The appellant contends that the commission’s order is contrary to the weight of the evidence, is not supported by sufficient evidence and is arbitrary, unreasonable and an abuse of discretion.

The commission determined the crossing in question to be dangerous and that flasher lights are necessary. The record contains evidence supporting the contentions of both parties. Ordinarily this court will not substitute its judgment on questions of fact for that of the commission. It does not appear from an examination of the record that the order of the commission is against the manifest weight of the evidence or is otherwise unlawful or unreasonable. The order is, therefore, affirmed. New York Central Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 166 Ohio St., 113.

Order affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias and Bell, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., dissents. O’Neill, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 413 (Ohio 1961).

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 413 (Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.