Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission

155 N.E. 864, 115 Ohio St. 733, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 733, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 668, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 233
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1926·No. 18870·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged that the order of the said public utilities commission be, and the same hereby is, reversed on authority of Napier, Atty. Genl., v. Atlantic Coast Line Rd. Co., Chicago & N. W. Rd. Co. v. Rd. Comm. of Wisconsin, and Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Rd. Comm. of Wisconsin, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, November 29, 1926, 272 U. S., 605, 47 Sup. Ct., 207, and said cause is hereby remanded to the public utilities commission with instructions to sustain the motion of plaintiff in error to dismiss the proceeding.

Order reversed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission, 155 N.E. 864, 115 Ohio St. 733, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 733, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 668, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 233 (Ohio 1926).

155 N.E. 864 (Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C. A. King & Co. v. Horton
156 N.E. 124 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)