Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States

123 Ct. Cl. 529, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 64, 1952 WL 5927
United States Court of Claims·Decided November 4, 1952·No. No. 52-52; No. 198-52·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The pleadings and the issue here presented are identical with those in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Sarita Fe Railway Company v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 467. For the reasons therein stated plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in this action should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to plaintiff for the transportation services involved.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States, 123 Ct. Cl. 529, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 64, 1952 WL 5927 (cc 1952).

123 Ct. Cl. 529 (Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
126 Ct. Cl. 943 (Court of Claims, 1953)