Pennsylvania Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
This text of 119 A. 99 (Pennsylvania Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This ease was before the Supreme Court on certiorari to review an assessment of taxes made by Jeisey City against the prosecutor-appellant, which was reviewed by the stare board of taxes ana assessment and afEimed by that body. The Supreme Court affirmed the state board. As there was evidence to support the finding of facts made by the Supreme Court in affirming the decision under consideration in that tribunal, that fin a mg is not renewable in this court. Long Dock v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 90 N. J. L. 701.
The judgment of the Supreme Court reviewed here must, therefore, necessarily be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Katzenbacr, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackbrson, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 A. 99, 98 N.J.L. 283, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-railroad-v-state-board-of-taxes-assessment-nj-1922.