Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pemberton & New York Railroad

28 N.J. Eq. 338
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedMay 15, 1877
StatusPublished

This text of 28 N.J. Eq. 338 (Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pemberton & New York Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pemberton & New York Railroad, 28 N.J. Eq. 338 (N.J. Ct. App. 1877).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The hill is filed by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company on behalf of themselves, and all other creditors of the Pemberton and New York Railroad Company who may come in and contribute to the expenses of the suit, under the fifty-seventh section of the “act respecting railroads and canals.” Rev. 1874-5, p. 709. That -section provides that, whenever any railroad, canal or turnpike company, incorporated under the laws of this state, shall have become insolvent, or shall have failed, for ninety days after the same shall have become due, to pay the principal or interest on any mortgage on the property or franchises of the company, it shall be lawful for the chancellor, upon the application of any creditor, mortgagee or stockholder of the company, to appoint a receiver or receivers, or three trustees, who shall have and exercise all the powers and authority of receivers under the “ act concerning corporations;” and it shall be lawful for such, receiver or receivers, or trustees, to sell or lease the canal, railroad, or turnpike belonging to such company, together [339]*339with all the chartered rights, privileges, and franchises of such company; and the purchaser or purchasers, lessee or lessees, of such work, chartered rights, privileges, and franchises, shall thereafter hold, use, and enjoy the same during the whole of the residue of the term limited in the charter of the company, or during the term in such lease specified, in as full and ample manner as the stockholders of such company could or might have enjoyed the same, subject, however, to all the restrictions, limitations, and conditions contained in the charter; and on filing in the office of the secretary of state, within six months after such sale or lease, a certificate that- they accept under some corporate name, different from that of the company whose property has been sold or leased, the charter of the company, such purchaser or purchasers shall become a corporation under the name so specified, with all the powers, rights, privileges, and franchises of the former company; and the lessee or purchaser, ot the corporation so formed by them, shall hold and enjoy the same free and clear of all debts, claims and demands of creditors, mortgagees, or stockholders, who shall look only to the fund arising from such lease or sale; which money, as collected, shall be paid into the court of chancery; but where the property is subject to a mortgage the chancellor shall, if the principal is not due, direct a sale or lease to be made subject to the lien of the mortgage.

The bill is filed against The Pemberton and Yew York Eailroad Company, The Yew Jersey Southern Eailroad Company, Benjamin Williamson, surviving trustee under a mortgage made by the latter company, Eobert E. Stockton, receiver of that company, and Joseph P. Bradley, surviving trustee under the mortgage given by The Pemberton and Yew York Eailroad Company, to secure certain bonds for non-payment of the interest on which the bill is filed. It prays for the appointment of a receiver under the provisions of the act concerning corporations, and that the receiver may be decreed to make sale of the railroad property, franchises, and things of The Pemberton and Yew York Eail[340]*340road Company, subject to tbe last-mentioned mortgage, executed in favor of George R. Upton (now deceased) and Joseph P. Bradley, the principal of which will be due, by its terms, irrespective of forfeiture'arising from non-payment of interest, in the year 1900 (to which sale the complainants give their assent), and that the receiver be directed to apply the proceeds of the sale, after paying costs and expenses, first, to the payment of past due interest coupons of the bonds secured by that mortgage, and then to bring the balance into this court. The bill also contains a general prayer for relief. It states the incorporation of the Pemberton and New York Railroad Company, by act approved on the 3d of February, 1870 ; that the charter empowers them to borrow money for the purpose of the company, and to secure the repayment thereof by bond and mortgage upon their property or otherwise, and gives authority to any corporation or corporations under the laws of this state, to endorse their bonds, and subscribe for and take any amount of their capital stock; and it also states that the company were, by the charter, authorized to lease their road or any part of it, or consolidate with or lease any railroad in this state which might thereafter be built. It appears by the bill that the company, having organized and negotiated a series of their bonds on or about the 1st of April, 1870, to the amount of $376,000, secured the payment thereof by a mortgage of that date (which was also the date of the bonds) to Messrs. Upton and Bradley, on their railroad and its equipments, appurtenances, property, franchises and things in the mortgage mentioned and described. The principal was, as before mentioned, made payable in 1900, but bore interest at seven per cent, per annum, payable, on the presentation and surrender of the interest coupons attached to the bonds, on the first day of March and the first day of September in each year. Before the issuing of those bonds, and in October in the year 1869, the companies known as The United Companies entered into a contract with a corporation then known as The Raritan and Delaware [341]*341Bay Railroad Company, to construct a railroad from a point at or near Manchester, in this state, to a point at or near Pemberton, in this state, and connecting the railroad of the latter company with the Burlington County Railroad. Eor the purpose of constructing that road, the latter company were to issue bonds to the amount of $375,000, to be secured by a first mortgage on the connecting railroad and the property and franchises thereof that might at any time be acquired. The principal of the bonds was to be payable in not less than twenty years, and interest was to be payable thereon at the rate of seven per cent, per annum, and the payment of the principal and interest was to be guaranteed by the United Companies. It was further agreed that in case it should be necessary or proper, in order effectually to carry out the purpose of that agreement, a charter for a company should be obtained and a company organized thereunder, and the bonds and mortgages were to be made by such company, and guaranteed by the United Companies. On the 16th of February, 1870, the name of The Raritan and Delaware Bay Railroad Company was, by act of the legislature, changed to the Tew Jersey Southern Railroad Company, and that company procured the passage of the act incorporating the Pemberton and Tew York Railroad Company, to construct the connecting road, and the latter company issued the bonds provided for in the agreement above mentioned, and they were guaranteed by the United Companies. The Tew Jersey Southern Railroad Company acquired all the stock of the Pemberton and Tew York Company, and have been operating the connecting road and taking the receipts thereof, but have failed to pay the interest on the bonds.

The bill states that Benjamin Williamson, esquire, as surviving trustee, by virtue of some indenture of mortgage executed by the Tew Jersey Southern Railroad Company to secure bonds issued and negotiated by them, or by force of some proceeding in this court, has taken possession of the Tew Jersey Southern Railroad and of the other railroads [342]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 N.J. Eq. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-railroad-v-pemberton-new-york-railroad-njch-1877.