Pennsylvania Railroad v. Kennett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Kennett

81 P. 1133, 71 Kan. 872, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 281

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJune 10, 1905

DocketNo. 14,176

StatusPublished

This text of 81 P. 1133 (Pennsylvania Railroad v. Kennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Kennett, 81 P. 1133, 71 Kan. 872, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 281 (kan 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

From the briefs and statement of counsel it appears that this action was commenced by Homer Kennett against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company before a justice of the peace. Plaintiff had judgment, and the case was taken to the district court on a bill of exceptions, and judgment again rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant prosecutes error on a transcript of the record.

A motion is filed by the defendant in error to dismiss the proceeding for the reason that the transcript is unintelligible, incomplete, and loaded with extraneous matter not connected with the case. This motion must be sustained. Notwithstanding counsel for plaintiff in error have attempted to make this record intelligible by a supplemental brief and index, it is absolutely non-understandable.

The cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

From the briefs and statement of counsel it appears that this action was commenced by Homer Kennett against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company before a justice of the peace. Plaintiff had judgment, and the case was taken to the district court on a bill of exceptions, and judgment again rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant prosecutes error on a transcript of the record.

A motion is filed by the defendant in error to dismiss the proceeding for the reason that the transcript is unintelligible, incomplete, and loaded with extraneous matter not connected with the case. This motion must be sustained. Notwithstanding counsel for plaintiff in error have attempted to make this record intelligible by a supplemental brief and index, it is absolutely non-understandable.

The cause is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 P. 1133, 71 Kan. 872, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-railroad-v-kennett-kan-1905.