Pennsylvania R. v. Repine

Third Circuit

Pennsylvania R. v. Repine

272 F. 898, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1708

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 9, 1921

DocketNo. 2630

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 F. 898 (Pennsylvania R. v. Repine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pennsylvania R. v. Repine, 272 F. 898, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1708 (3d Cir. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The substantial question argued at bar in this case was the instructions of the trial judge on the question whether the movement for repairs of the car with a defective coupler or brake was per se negligence. On closer examination we find no exception was taken at the trial to any part of the charge which bore on that matter. Consequently there is no foundation on which error can be assigned.

As none of the remaining assignments show error, the judgment below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The substantial question argued at bar in this case was the instructions of the trial judge on the question whether the movement for repairs of the car with a defective coupler or brake was per se negligence. On closer examination we find no exception was taken at the trial to any part of the charge which bore on that matter. Consequently there is no foundation on which error can be assigned.

As none of the remaining assignments show error, the judgment below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 F. 898, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-r-v-repine-ca3-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack