Pennsylvania R. v. Carbon Coal & Coke Co.

Third Circuit

Pennsylvania R. v. Carbon Coal & Coke Co.

208 F. 145, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1687

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 4, 1913·No. Nos. 1625-1629·Published

Opinion

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

When these cases were called for argument, counsel agreed at bar that (in view of recent decisions by the Supreme Court upon the measure of damages in this class of cases) the instructions and rulings by the District Court upon that subject were erroneous.

It is therefore ordered that iti each of the foregoing cases the judgment he reversed, upon this ground alone — no other question being considered or decided by this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

When these cases were called for argument, counsel agreed at bar that (in view of recent decisions by the Supreme Court upon the measure of damages in this class of cases) the instructions and rulings by the District Court upon that subject were erroneous.

It is therefore ordered that iti each of the foregoing cases the judgment he reversed, upon this ground alone — no other question being considered or decided by this court.

Pennsylvania R. v. Carbon Coal & Coke Co., 208 F. 145, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1687 (3d Cir. 1913).

Pincite

208 F. 145 (Pennsylvania R. v. Carbon Coal & Coke Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.