Pennsylvania & New York Canal & Railroad v. Huff
This text of 8 A. 789 (Pennsylvania & New York Canal & Railroad v. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It would clearly have been error for the court to have taken this case from the jury. Henry Huff was killed while attempting to ride over the railroad at a public crossing. The unquestioned evidence is that when he approached the railroad he stopped, looked, and listened. The contention was whether the place where he stopped was a suitable one to see and hear, and whether dne effort was made to ascertain if a train was approaching. The evidence as to this was well submitted by the court and justified the finding of the jury.
We see no error in the charge nor in the answers to the points.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A. 789, 6 Sadler 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-new-york-canal-railroad-v-huff-pa-1887.