Pennsylvania Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. Spiegel
194 So. 2d 643
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order confirming an arbitration award made pursuant to the uninsured motorist coverage. The appellant attempted to argue in the circuit court, and later in this court, its version of the weight of the evidence. The chancellor correctly held that the petitioner had failed to state grounds for vacating the award. See Fla.Stat. § 57.22, F.S.A.; Kest v. Nathanson, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 690.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pennsylvania Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. Spiegel, 194 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
194 So. 2d 643 (Pennsylvania Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. Spiegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kest v. Nathanson
184 So. 2d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)