Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Hilltop Country Club Application for New Catering Club Liquor License

363 A.2d 882, 26 Pa. Commw. 206, 1976 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 794
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 30, 1976
DocketAppeal, No. 1536 C.D. 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 363 A.2d 882 (Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Hilltop Country Club Application for New Catering Club Liquor License) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Hilltop Country Club Application for New Catering Club Liquor License, 363 A.2d 882, 26 Pa. Commw. 206, 1976 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 794 (Pa. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board) brings this appeal from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County which reversed the. Board’s refusal of a new “catering club” liquor license to the Hilltop Country Club (Hilltop). We reverse.

It was established without contradiction, before the Board and at the trial de novo that Lower Alsace Township, in which Hilltop is located, has exceeded its quota of retail liquor licenses under Section 461 of the Liquor Code1 (Code), 47 P.S. §4-461. Hilltop sought therefore to bring itself within the exception in Section 461(b) of the Code which provides:

[208]*208“(b) The board shall have the power to increase the number of licenses in any such municipality which in the opinion of the board is located within a resort area.”

The court below correctly found that the facts as marshalled by Hilltop did not support a conclusion that Lower Alsace, Township or the surrounding area was a “resort area” within the current judicial definitions of that term. See Petition of Springdale District Sportsmen’s Association, 20 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 479, 342 A.2d 802 (1975). Nevertheless, the Court stated:

“[W]e are of the opinion that under the circumstances the applicant’s [Hilltop’s] facilities should be considered a resort area for its members and guests.”

The lower court’s sympathy with Hilltop’s application is understandable from this record. However, without a specific finding of a seasonal influx of transients, necessitating an increased number of licensed establishments to serve them,2 it was error for the lower court to sustain Hilltop’s appeal.

Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
363 A.2d 882, 26 Pa. Commw. 206, 1976 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-liquor-control-board-v-hilltop-country-club-application-for-pacommwct-1976.