Pennsylvania General Insurance v. Mortenson
This text of 250 A.D.2d 745 (Pennsylvania General Insurance v. Mortenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to enforce a contractual right to a trial de novo, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard J.), dated May 1, 1997, which (1) denied his motion to confirm an arbitration award dated July 15, 1996, and to dismiss the complaint, and (2) granted the plaintiff’s cross motion to vacate the arbitration award.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We conclude that the parties proceeded to arbitration in ac[746]*746cordance with the provisions of the policy of insurance. Accordingly, the plaintiff did not waive or otherwise fail to invoke its right to demand a trial de novo under the terms of that policy (see, Matter of Izzo v Allstate Ins. Co., 228 AD2d 441; Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Fennimore, 224 AD2d 402; cf., Matter of General Ace. Ins. Co. [Giacomazzo], 204 AD2d 236). Thus, the Supreme Court properly vacated the arbitration award. Ritter, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D.2d 745, 671 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-general-insurance-v-mortenson-nyappdiv-1998.