Pennsylvania Co. v. West Penn Railways Co.

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 390
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pennsylvania Co. v. West Penn Railways Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 Ohio St. 516
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1924·No. No. 18334·Published

Opinion

MARSHALL, C. J.

1. The assignee and owner of a valid judgment rendered in any court of record in Ohio may maintain an action and recover another judgment thereon in any court of competent jurisdiction within this state.

2. In such action no other proof is necessary than the record of such former judgment and competent evidence of a valid assignment and transfer thereof.

3. Where a judgment has been rendered against two joint tort-feasors, an action can be maintained and final judgment rendered upon the record of judgment debtors against one of such judgment debtors even though no service of summons is m’ade upon the other judgment debtor. There being no contribution between joint tort-feasors the record of such judgment is a joint and several liability.

Judgment affirmed.

Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania Co. v. West Penn Railways Co., 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 390 (Ohio 1924).

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 390 (Pennsylvania Co. v. West Penn Railways Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.