Pennsylvania Co. v. McCarty
13 N.E. 409, 112 Ind. 322, 1887 Ind. LEXIS 407
Opinion
Appellee’s animal entered upon appellant’s railway and was killed by one of its trains at a point in the city of Jeffersonville where the track might have been, and, under the act of 1863 (R. S. 1881, section 4025, et seq.,) ought to have been, but was not, securely fenced.
The decision in the recent case of Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Dunlap, ante, p. 93, is conclusive upon the question here involved. Upon the-authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pennsylvania Co. v. McCarty, 13 N.E. 409, 112 Ind. 322, 1887 Ind. LEXIS 407 (Ind. 1887).
13 N.E. 409 (Pennsylvania Co. v. McCarty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hooten v. Alt
191 N.E.2d 13 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1963)
PETERCHEFF v. City of Indianapolis
178 N.E.2d 746 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1961)
Jones v. Nay
163 N.E.2d 119 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1960)
Parker v. Seward School Township
159 N.E.2d 576 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1959)
Pullin v. Arnold
122 N.E.2d 858 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1954)
Current v. Current
125 N.E. 779 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1920)
State ex rel. Tate v. Wolf
158 N.W. 78 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1916)
Sim v. Rosholt
112 N.W. 50 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1907)
State ex rel. Andrews v. Boyden
108 N.W. 897 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1906)