Pennsylvania Co. v. McCarty
This text of 13 N.E. 409 (Pennsylvania Co. v. McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee’s animal entered upon appellant’s railway and was killed by one of its trains at a point in the city of Jeffersonville where the track might have been, and, under the act of 1863 (R. S. 1881, section 4025, et seq.,) ought to have been, but was not, securely fenced.
The decision in the recent case of Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Dunlap, ante, p. 93, is conclusive upon the question here involved. Upon the-authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 N.E. 409, 112 Ind. 322, 1887 Ind. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-co-v-mccarty-ind-1887.