Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Scott

118 S. Ct. 554, 139 L. Ed. 2d 397, 522 U.S. 992, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 7060, 97 Daily Journal DAR 14472, 66 U.S.L.W. 3385, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8940
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 26, 1997·No. No. 97-581·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. In addition to this question, the parties are invited to brief and argue the following question: “Must a search of a parolee’s residence be based on reasonable suspicion to be valid under the Fourth Amendment where the parolee has consented to searches as a condition of his parole?” Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, January 9, 1998. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 6,1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 8 p.m., Friday, March 6,1998. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Scott, 118 S. Ct. 554, 139 L. Ed. 2d 397, 522 U.S. 992, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 7060, 97 Daily Journal DAR 14472, 66 U.S.L.W. 3385, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8940 (U.S. 1997).

118 S. Ct. 554 (Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Reyes
968 P.2d 445 (California Supreme Court, 1998)