Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Scott
This text of 118 S. Ct. 554 (Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. In addition to this question, the parties are invited to brief and argue the following question: “Must a search of a parolee’s residence be based on reasonable suspicion to be valid under the Fourth Amendment where the parolee has consented to searches as a condition of his parole?” Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, January 9, 1998. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 6,1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 8 p.m., Friday, March 6,1998. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 S. Ct. 554, 139 L. Ed. 2d 397, 522 U.S. 992, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 7060, 97 Daily Journal DAR 14472, 66 U.S.L.W. 3385, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-board-of-probation-parole-v-scott-scotus-1997.