Pennock v. Lenzi

897 A.2d 462

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 19, 2006·Published

Opinion

RUSSELL PENNOCK AND ANTOINETTE PENNOCK, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF DANIEL PENNOCK, Petitioners
v.
RICHARD V. LENZI AND CARMINE D. LENZI, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES AND D/B/A RIDGE CREST FARMS, MELVIN C. GELSINGER, GALE GELSINGER, ESTHER GELSINGER, CLARENCE D. GELSINGER, RETTEW ASSOCIATES, INC., BERKS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.

April 19, 2006.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RUSSELL PENNOCK AND ANTOINETTE PENNOCK, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF DANIEL PENNOCK, Petitioners
v.
RICHARD V. LENZI AND CARMINE D. LENZI, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES AND D/B/A RIDGE CREST FARMS, MELVIN C. GELSINGER, GALE GELSINGER, ESTHER GELSINGER, CLARENCE D. GELSINGER, RETTEW ASSOCIATES, INC., BERKS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.

April 19, 2006.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

Pennock v. Lenzi, 897 A.2d 462 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

897 A.2d 462 (Pennock v. Lenzi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.