Pennlive v. Dept of Health (Pet of Terrapin LLC)
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 3 MAP 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
WALLACE MCKELVEY AND PENNLIVE : No. 393 MAL 2019 AND THE PATRIOT-NEWS :
: : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v. : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : :
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : HEALTH, : AND MISSION PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, : KW VENTURES HOLDING, LLC, : CRESCO YELTRAH, LLC, SMPD : MANUFACTURING, LLC/SMPB RETAIL, : LLC AND TERRAPIN INVESTMENT : FUND, 1, LLC (Direct Interest : Participants) :
: : : : :
PETITION OF: TERRAPIN INVESTMENT : FUND 1, LLC :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
In considering whether financial information submitted in a medical marijuana application was “confidential and proprietary,” whether the Commonwealth Court erred in disregarding substantial evidence of “competitive harm” and of the significant security issues associated with disclosure of financial information in a unique cash-based business.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pennlive v. Dept of Health (Pet of Terrapin LLC) (Pennlive v. Dept of Health (Pet of Terrapin LLC)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.