Pennington v. Ziman

13 A.D.2d 769, 216 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10593
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 1961·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order entered on July 28, 1960, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 and subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave, however, for the plaintiff-respondent to replead, if so advised, upon a showing by allegation of ultimate facts that a rescission of the agreement would accomplish some proper purpose, since equity will not suffer the making of a vain arder. (Cf. Sivakoff v. Sivakoff, 280 App. Div. 106, 108.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennington v. Ziman, 13 A.D.2d 769, 216 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

13 A.D.2d 769 (Pennington v. Ziman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AMF INC. v. Brunswick Corp.
621 F. Supp. 456 (E.D. New York, 1985)
Beslity v. Manhattan Honda
113 Misc. 2d 888 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1982)
Livoti v. Elston
52 A.D.2d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)