Pennington v. Taylor

Fourth Circuit

Pennington v. Taylor

98 F. App'x 957

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2004·No. No. 04-6443·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Pennington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pennington v. Taylor, No. CA-02-604-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Pennington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pennington v. Taylor, No. CA-02-604-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Pennington v. Taylor, 98 F. App'x 957 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

98 F. App'x 957 (Pennington v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related