Pennington v. . Tarboro

105 S.E. 199, 180 N.C. 438, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 111
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 1, 1920·Published

Opinion

CLARK, C. J., dissenting. This is an action to restrain the sale of bonds at less than par, as the defendant was authorized to do by an act of the General Assembly enacted at the Special Session, 1920.

There was a judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed. This appeal is controlled by the decision in Kornegay v. Goldsboro, at this term, and upon that authority the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennington v. . Tarboro, 105 S.E. 199, 180 N.C. 438, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 111 (N.C. 1920).

105 S.E. 199 (Pennington v. . Tarboro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.