Pennington v. . Tarboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Pennington v. . Tarboro

105 S.E. 199, 180 N.C. 438, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 111

DecidedDecember 1, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 199 (Pennington v. . Tarboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pennington v. . Tarboro, 105 S.E. 199, 180 N.C. 438, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 111 (N.C. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

CLARK, C. J., dissenting. This is an action to restrain the sale of bonds at less than par, as the defendant was authorized to do by an act of the General Assembly enacted at the Special Session, 1920.

There was a judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed. This appeal is controlled by the decision in Kornegay v. Goldsboro, at this term, and upon that authority the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CLARK, C. J., dissenting. This is an action to restrain the sale of bonds at less than par, as the defendant was authorized to do by an act of the General Assembly enacted at the Special Session, 1920.

There was a judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed. This appeal is controlled by the decision in Kornegay v. Goldsboro, at this term, and upon that authority the judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 S.E. 199, 180 N.C. 438, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennington-v-tarboro-nc-1920.