Pennington v. State
641 So. 2d 187, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8254, 1994 WL 444890
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 19, 1994·No. No. 93-2898·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The sentence in this case is violative of the dictates of Thompson v. State, 638 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA June 3, 1994) and must be vacated. Upon remand appellant must be given the option to withdraw his guilty plea should the court intend to depart from the sentencing guidelines. Finally, it is apparent the court’s written community control order is different from the judge’s oral pronouncements.
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pennington v. State, 641 So. 2d 187, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8254, 1994 WL 444890 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
641 So. 2d 187 (Pennington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Pennington
657 So. 2d 1161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)