Pennington v. Harvest Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Pennington v. Harvest Foods, Inc.

913 S.W.2d 760, 322 Ark. 825, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 751

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 18, 1995

Docket95-732

StatusPublished

This text of 913 S.W.2d 760 (Pennington v. Harvest Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pennington v. Harvest Foods, Inc., 913 S.W.2d 760, 322 Ark. 825, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 751 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Some of the appellants in this case, namely, John Oldner, John Oldner Consulting Services, Inc., d/b/a/ John Oldner Enterprises, Joel Tumblson, Sr., and Soundra Tumblson, Joel Tumblson, Jr., T.S.P. Inc., Billy Armstrong, and Service Brokerage, have filed motions to settle the record. In a per curiam opinion issued this date, we have dismissed the appeals of Mr. Armstrong and Service Brokerage. The motions of the other appellants are granted.

The motions explain that certain exhibits, which formed the basis of the testimony of several witnesses, were lost in the transfer from the temporary court quarters in the KARK building to the Pulaski County Courthouse. The motions and responses also indicate that the record can be settled through the inclusion of photocopies of each of the exhibits. The parties request that a writ of certiorari, returnable within 30 days, to the lower court to settle the record.

The writ is granted and the briefing time for each of these parties is stayed until 15 days after the writ is returned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Some of the appellants in this case, namely, John Oldner, John Oldner Consulting Services, Inc., d/b/a/ John Oldner Enterprises, Joel Tumblson, Sr., and Soundra Tumblson, Joel Tumblson, Jr., T.S.P. Inc., Billy Armstrong, and Service Brokerage, have filed motions to settle the record. In a per curiam opinion issued this date, we have dismissed the appeals of Mr. Armstrong and Service Brokerage. The motions of the other appellants are granted.

The motions explain that certain exhibits, which formed the basis of the testimony of several witnesses, were lost in the transfer from the temporary court quarters in the KARK building to the Pulaski County Courthouse. The motions and responses also indicate that the record can be settled through the inclusion of photocopies of each of the exhibits. The parties request that a writ of certiorari, returnable within 30 days, to the lower court to settle the record.

The writ is granted and the briefing time for each of these parties is stayed until 15 days after the writ is returned.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

913 S.W.2d 760, 322 Ark. 825, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennington-v-harvest-foods-inc-ark-1995.