Pennington v. Baehr
48 Cal. 565, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 202
This text of 48 Cal. 565 (Pennington v. Baehr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pennington v. Baehr, 48 Cal. 565, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 202 (Cal. 1874).
Opinion
ordered the mandamus to issue as prayed for.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Irvine v. Bossen
155 P.2d 9 (California Supreme Court, 1944)
Smith v. Curran
255 N.W. 276 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)
Allenberg v. Rapken Co., Ltd.
291 P. 281 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
O'Neil v. Brode
181 P. 91 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Petaluma Rock Co. v. Smith
137 P. 290 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)
Hewel v. Hogin
84 P. 1002 (California Court of Appeal, 1906)
Ardery v. Smith
73 N.E. 840 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)
Loughren v. B. F. Bonniwell & Co.
101 N.W. 287 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
Beattys v. Town of Solon
19 N.Y.S. 37 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
McKee v. Vernon County
16 F. Cas. 188 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1874)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 Cal. 565, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennington-v-baehr-cal-1874.