Pennington-Thurman v. Schermer

Eighth Circuit

Pennington-Thurman v. Schermer

713 F. App'x 519

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2018·No. No. 17-2041·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wilma Pennington-Thurman appeals the district court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of her pro se civil case. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Pennington-Thurman failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Wilma Pennington-Thurman appeals the district court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of her pro se civil case. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Pennington-Thurman failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Pennington-Thurman v. Schermer, 713 F. App'x 519 (8th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

713 F. App'x 519 (Pennington-Thurman v. Schermer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related