Pennington-Thurman v. Schermer

Eighth Circuit

Pennington-Thurman v. Schermer

713 F. App'x 519

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 1, 2018

DocketNo. 17-2041

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 713 F. App'x 519 (Pennington-Thurman v. Schermer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pennington-Thurman v. Schermer, 713 F. App'x 519 (8th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wilma Pennington-Thurman appeals the district court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of her pro se civil case. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Pennington-Thurman failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Wilma Pennington-Thurman appeals the district court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of her pro se civil case. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Pennington-Thurman failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

713 F. App'x 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennington-thurman-v-schermer-ca8-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack