Pennington-Thurman v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pennington-Thurman v. Bank of Am., N.A.

556 S.W.3d 68

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 22, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 556 S.W.3d 68 (Pennington-Thurman v. Bank of Am., N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pennington-Thurman v. Bank of Am., N.A., 556 S.W.3d 68 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*69Wilma Pennington-Thurman ("Appellant"), acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying her motion to reopen two actions for fraud and wrongful foreclosure, both of which were finally decided in 2010. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*69Wilma Pennington-Thurman ("Appellant"), acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying her motion to reopen two actions for fraud and wrongful foreclosure, both of which were finally decided in 2010. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 S.W.3d 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennington-thurman-v-bank-of-am-na-moctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack