Penningham v. State

129 So. 486, 23 Ala. App. 577, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 185
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 24, 1930
Docket6 Div. 825.
StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 486 (Penningham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penningham v. State, 129 So. 486, 23 Ala. App. 577, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 185 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There is no bill of exceptions. Where this is the case, it has been repeatedly held that this court will not review the action of the trial court in giving or refusing written charges. Stacks v. State, 20 Ala. App. 462, 103 So. 70; Thomas v. State, 20 Ala. App. 550, 103 So. 479; Mack v. State, 201 Ala. 269, 77 So. 683.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stacks v. State
103 So. 70 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Thomas v. State
103 So. 479 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Mack v. State
77 So. 683 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 So. 486, 23 Ala. App. 577, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penningham-v-state-alactapp-1930.