Penningham v. State
129 So. 486, 23 Ala. App. 577, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 185
Opinion
There is no bill of exceptions. Where this is the case, it has been repeatedly held that this court will not review the action of the trial court in giving or refusing written charges. Stacks v. State, 20 Ala. App. 462, 103 So. 70; Thomas v. State, 20 Ala. App. 550, 103 So. 479; Mack v. State, 201 Ala. 269, 77 So. 683.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Penningham v. State, 129 So. 486, 23 Ala. App. 577, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 185 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).
129 So. 486 (Penningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stacks v. State
103 So. 70 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Thomas v. State
103 So. 479 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Mack v. State
77 So. 683 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)