Penning v. Laser Surge, Inc.
207 A.D.2d 1037, 617 N.Y.S.2d 684
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 1994
StatusPublished
This text of 207 A.D.2d 1037 (Penning v. Laser Surge, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Penning v. Laser Surge, Inc., 207 A.D.2d 1037, 617 N.Y.S.2d 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).
Opinion
—Motion for stay denied. Memorandum: Defendants have not offered any facts to establish that they will be prejudiced if a stay is not granted or to demonstrate a meritorious appeal. Moreover, defendants have given no indication of the subject matter of the challenged disclosure. Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
207 A.D.2d 1037, 617 N.Y.S.2d 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penning-v-laser-surge-inc-nyappdiv-1994.