Penney v. Somerville

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Penney v. Somerville

3 La. Ann. 668

DecidedNovember 15, 1848

StatusPublished

This text of 3 La. Ann. 668 (Penney v. Somerville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penney v. Somerville, 3 La. Ann. 668 (La. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Kino, J:

A motion has been made to dismiss this appeal, on the ground that tho transcript was not filed within .the delay fixed by the .order of the district judge.

[669]*669Tho appeal was made returnable on the fourth monday of April, 1848, which Rennet was the 24th of the month. The transcript was not filed until the 12th of Somerviele. May following. More than three judicial days elapsed between those dates. The motion must prevail. See 8 La. 206. 6 Rob. 280. 2 An. R. 453, 769.

Appeal dismiseed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Kino, J:

A motion has been made to dismiss this appeal, on the ground that tho transcript was not filed within .the delay fixed by the .order of the district judge.

[669]*669Tho appeal was made returnable on the fourth monday of April, 1848, which Rennet was the 24th of the month. The transcript was not filed until the 12th of Somerviele. May following. More than three judicial days elapsed between those dates. The motion must prevail. See 8 La. 206. 6 Rob. 280. 2 An. R. 453, 769.

Appeal dismiseed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 La. Ann. 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penney-v-somerville-la-1848.