Penney v. Penney

1 So. 2d 883, 146 Fla. 652, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1207
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 2d 883 (Penney v. Penney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penney v. Penney, 1 So. 2d 883, 146 Fla. 652, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1207 (Fla. 1941).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause is before us on petition for certiorari under Rule 34 to review an order entered by the circuit judge in an action for separate maintenance and for the custody of the adopted children of the parties, in which order the circuit judge awarded temporary support and maintenance to the plaintiff wife for herself and the two minor children, and the payment of her counsel fees and costs. The cause was submitted here upon the petition for writ of certiorari, transcript of the proceedings in the trial court, and upon the well prepared briefs of counsel and also oral argument, all of which has been duly considered by the *653 Court. A majority of the Court are not convinced that any reversible error or abuse of discretion on the part of the-chancellor has been made to appear.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Brown, C. J., Terrell, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Whitfield, Buford and Chapman, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lathrop v. Lathrop
63 A. 514 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1906)
State, Ex Rel. v. Hamans, Et Ux
159 So. 31 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Windham v. Windham
198 So. 202 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Kennedy v. Kennedy
134 So. 201 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Floyd v. Floyd
108 So. 896 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
State Ex Rel. Rasco v. Rasco
190 So. 510 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Frazier v. Frazier
147 So. 464 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Hancock v. Dupree
129 So. 822 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Stover v. Stovall
137 So. 249 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Shepard v. Shepard
174 So. 330 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Fields v. Fields
197 So. 530 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
State Ex Rel. Bonsack v. Campbell
184 So. 332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Minick v. Minick
149 So. 483 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Myers Const. Co. v. Batson
126 So. 822 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Underwood v. Underwood
12 Fla. 434 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1868)
Phelan v. Phelan
12 Fla. 449 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1868)
McGill v. McGill
19 Fla. 341 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1882)
Sanchez v. Sanchez
21 Fla. 346 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1885)
Haddon v. Haddon
36 Fla. 413 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1895)
Miller v. Miller
38 Fla. 227 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 So. 2d 883, 146 Fla. 652, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penney-v-penney-fla-1941.