Penner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Penner v. State

1914 OK CR 64, 138 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 676, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 152

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 5, 1914

DocketNo. A-1926.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 64 (Penner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penner v. State, 1914 OK CR 64, 138 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 676, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 152 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted upon an information which charged the unlawful sale of whisky to one J. A. Mulky, and on the 21st day of January, 1913, was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of one hundred fifty days, and to pay a fine of three hundred dollars. An appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 5, 1913, a petition in error with case-made. After a careful examination of the various questions raised, we are satisfied that, under well settled rules, sustained and uqDheld by the decisions of this court, no error has been committed, to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant. The judgment of the county court of Beck-ham county is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted upon an information which charged the unlawful sale of whisky to one J. A. Mulky, and on the 21st day of January, 1913, was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of one hundred fifty days, and to pay a fine of three hundred dollars. An appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 5, 1913, a petition in error with case-made. After a careful examination of the various questions raised, we are satisfied that, under well settled rules, sustained and uqDheld by the decisions of this court, no error has been committed, to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant. The judgment of the county court of Beck-ham county is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 64, 138 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 676, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penner-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.