Penner Installation Corp. v. United States

Court of Claims

Penner Installation Corp. v. United States

89 F. Supp. 321, 116 Ct. Cl. 568, 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedApril 3, 1950

DocketNo. 47267

StatusPublished

This text of 89 F. Supp. 321 (Penner Installation Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penner Installation Corp. v. United States, 89 F. Supp. 321, 116 Ct. Cl. 568, 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100 (cc 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

[569]*569OPINION PER CURIAM

Per Curiam:

The motion for a new trial in this case is allowed, the conclusion of law and judgment [114 C. Cls. 585] heretofore entered is withdrawn, and plaintiff’s petition will be dismissed, inasmuch as there is no showing in this case that the contracting officer and head of the department acted arbitrarily, capricously, or that his decision was so grossly erroneous as to imply bad faith. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[569]*569OPINION PER CURIAM

Per Curiam:

The motion for a new trial in this case is allowed, the conclusion of law and judgment [114 C. Cls. 585] heretofore entered is withdrawn, and plaintiff’s petition will be dismissed, inasmuch as there is no showing in this case that the contracting officer and head of the department acted arbitrarily, capricously, or that his decision was so grossly erroneous as to imply bad faith. It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 F. Supp. 321, 116 Ct. Cl. 568, 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penner-installation-corp-v-united-states-cc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack