Penner Installation Corp. v. United States
89 F. Supp. 321, 116 Ct. Cl. 568, 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Penner Installation Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 F. Supp. 131 →
Opinion
[569] OPINION PER CURIAM
The motion for a new trial in this case is allowed, the conclusion of law and judgment [114 C. Cls. 585] heretofore entered is withdrawn, and plaintiff’s petition will be dismissed, inasmuch as there is no showing in this case that the contracting officer and head of the department acted arbitrarily, capricously, or that his decision was so grossly erroneous as to imply bad faith. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Penner Installation Corp. v. United States, 89 F. Supp. 321, 116 Ct. Cl. 568, 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100 (cc 1950).
89 F. Supp. 321 (Penner Installation Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penner Installation Corp. v. United States
86 F. Supp. 131 (Court of Claims, 1949)