PennEnergy Resources, LLC v. ETC Northeast Field Services, LLC
This text of PennEnergy Resources, LLC v. ETC Northeast Field Services, LLC (PennEnergy Resources, LLC v. ETC Northeast Field Services, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-23-00240-CV
PENNENERGY RESOURCES, LLC, Appellant v.
ETC NORTHEAST FIELD SERVICES, LLC, Appellee
From the 82nd District Court Robertson County, Texas Trial Court No. 22-09-21523-CV
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PennEnergy Resources, LLC, and ETC Northeast Field Services, LLC, have filed a
“Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Request to Expedite” asserting that they have
settled their disputes in the underlying proceeding. Accordingly, the parties request
that we
(1) set aside the trial court’s Final Judgment signed July 12, 2023, without regard to the merits; (2) remand the matter to the trial court for entry of an order vacating all Receipt Point Arbitration Awards and entry of a final judgment conforming with the parties’ settlement agreement; (3) dismiss the appeal with prejudice; and (4) issue mandate immediately. We have no authority to dismiss the appeal and remand the case to the trial court.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). We have the authority, however, to set aside the trial
court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for
rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); 43.2(d).
Accordingly, the parties’ “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Request to
Expedite” is granted to the extent authorized. The trial court’s Final Judgment, signed
on July 12, 2023, is set aside without regard to the merits, and the case is remanded to
the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties.
Costs of appeal are taxed against the party incurring same. See id. R. 42.1(d). And we
order that this Court’s mandate in this case shall issue immediately. See id. R. 18.1(c).
Because the Court was unable to grant the entirety of the parties’ motion, the
Court has endeavored to implement the substance of the parties’ agreed motion to
achieve the same result. If the parties determine that the judgment of the Court does
not accomplish the parties’ intended result, a timely motion for rehearing must be filed
that addresses the manner in which the Court can implement the agreement of the
parties within the limitations of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 42.1; 49.1.
PennEnergy Resources, LLC v. ETC Northeast Field Services, LLC Page 2 MATT JOHNSON Justice
Before Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Davis 1 Set aside and remanded Opinion delivered and filed July 18, 2024 [CV06]
1 The Honorable Rex Davis, Senior Justice (Retired) of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
PennEnergy Resources, LLC v. ETC Northeast Field Services, LLC Page 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PennEnergy Resources, LLC v. ETC Northeast Field Services, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennenergy-resources-llc-v-etc-northeast-field-services-llc-texapp-2024.