Pennell v. State

485 S.W.3d 392, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 290, 2016 WL 1221733
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 2016·No. No. ED 102182·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael M. Pennell appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary, hearing. Pennell alleges two claims of ineffective assistance of counsel: 1) appellate counsel failed to argue that there was insufficient evidence to establish that what he delivered was a controlled substance; and 2) trial counsel was ineffective by eliciting evidence regarding the police’s investigation into Pen-nell prior to his arrest in the' underlying criminal case. Finding no clear error, we affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are- not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennell v. State, 485 S.W.3d 392, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 290, 2016 WL 1221733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

485 S.W.3d 392 (Pennell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.