Pennebaker and Roberts v. State

36 S.W.2d 156, 117 Tex. Crim. 16, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 260
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 25, 1931
DocketNo. 13975.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 36 S.W.2d 156 (Pennebaker and Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pennebaker and Roberts v. State, 36 S.W.2d 156, 117 Tex. Crim. 16, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 260 (Tex. 1931).

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

— This is an appeal from a judgment forfeiting an appearance bond.

The record discloses that judgment nisi was entered against Grace Roberts, principal, and T. S. Pennebaker and R. R. Roberts, sureties. Upon final hearing, judgment was rendered against the sureties. No disposition of the case was made as to Grace Roberts, the principal, and the judgment was not made final as to said principal. Hence this court is without jurisdiction. Cox et al v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 94, 29 S. W., 273.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lozano v. State
978 S.W.2d 645 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Joe's Bonding Company v. State
481 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.W.2d 156, 117 Tex. Crim. 16, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennebaker-and-roberts-v-state-texcrimapp-1931.